Topics › All Forums › The Great Bootleg Forest › Unofficial Live Audio Recordings › VH 1978-08-06 Oklahoma Jam (remaster)
This topic has 26 voices, contains 68 replies, and was last updated by Cut2TheCrash 2845 days ago.
September 16, 2014 at 10:45 pm Quote #38835 | |
mrmojohalen (6467) |
I would compare it to, let’s say one of the latest Led Zep album remasters at a 128k bit rate. You can appreciate the overall “fullness’ of the remastering process, except that in a lossy format, the overall sound quality cannot be fully realized & appreciated, which may defeat the whole process for those who are used to a lossless format. When you turn on your stereo, does it return the favor? mrmojohalenQuote |
September 17, 2014 at 12:33 am Quote #38839 | |
steecoe (1986) | |
September 17, 2014 at 11:27 am Quote #38846 | |
single-8 (222) | |
September 17, 2014 at 12:07 pm Quote #38847 | |
guitard (7354) | |
September 17, 2014 at 12:22 pm Quote #38849 | |
single-8 (222) |
I’ll have to do some SBS comp and see if its worth the hassle..after all Im giving shit away..there’s a big difference between 1 7/8 IPS cassettes vs 15 or 30 ips 2″ 16 or 24 track so using a zeppelin RM to compare is like comparing a happy meal to S&L ….Ive used all of the consumer/prosumer digital formats and the only one that comes close is DAT, all the others are inferior..(Looking at the audio waveforms on a timeline)..I can read the waveform just like troubleshooting electronics with an oscilliscope..its basically the same thing single-8Quote |
September 17, 2014 at 1:35 pm Quote #38850 | |
guitard (7354) | That’s mostly all Greek to me Rob. You asked what’s the format of choice, and as I said, it’s 1536 bit .wav file. It’s pretty much the only format used by serious fans of live audio recordings. Casual fans tend not to care – meaning .mp3 is fine for them. But the people at this site are almost all of the “serious” variety. Whatever you provide is gratefully appreciated and no one is going to complain if the format isn’t exactly what they are used to. Beggers can’t be choosers as the old saying goes. guitardQuote |
September 17, 2014 at 3:05 pm Quote #38851 | |
VOODOO (2375) | I think the general consensus is that, if these shows are out there in their purest form and cleanest format, they can be preserved in the highest possible quality and shared that way as well. I agree that not everyone asking is necessarily “complaining” about the format quality, but rather inquiring as to whether or not you’ll be providing a lossless copy of the show at some point down the road. I think I speak for 99% of the members here that we always appreciate when other members share quality recordings, regardless of the format. VOODOOQuote |
September 17, 2014 at 3:47 pm Quote #38853 | |
mrmojohalen (6467) | Rob – I wasn’t comparing one of the new Led Zep releases to your VH – OK City recording. I was comparing it to itself. The Led Zep CD sounds better than an mp3 version of it. That can be said for any recording out there – official release, live cassette recording, etc. That’s not to say that some mp3s won’t sound good. Your VH – OK City mp3 might be an exception. But I think you know that your WAV files are superior sound wise, just as your DAT files sound superior to your WAV files. Regardless of whether you choose to share your WAV version of the show, you will always have a better version in your DAT files that you will have just for yourself. When you turn on your stereo, does it return the favor? mrmojohalenQuote |
September 17, 2014 at 9:02 pm Quote #38857 | |
mikeyV (335) | yeah, its all greek……….I just wanna say thanks for taking the time and effort in enhancing a highly generated, classic show. It was nice to hear… The Ultimate in Van Halen Vinyl Proud Member Since the First Year– Both VHTrading and the Band mikeyVQuote |
September 18, 2014 at 2:56 am Quote #38860 | |
steecoe (1986) | Original master tape>dat>wav would be ideal. Most shows offeredup in lossless format for online trading are then converted to flac which retains the integrity of the music file while trimming the non-music flab off of the file to make them slightly smaller for upload/download. I think for most purists full cd format is a good standard. Taking the time to archive & preserve the original recording to DAT is awesome! Downgrading to share seems to me like an extra step & takes some of the shine off of such a wonderful recording. That to me would be like taking the HD remastered films and bumping them down to VHS for sharing. steecoeQuote |
September 18, 2014 at 3:30 am Quote #38863 | |
steecoe (1986) |
I get what you are saying. Compare the cassette>DAT waveform to the waveform of the .m4a file of the same recording & you will see. steecoeQuote |
September 18, 2014 at 12:34 pm Quote #38868 | |
guitard (7354) | |
September 18, 2014 at 1:09 pm Quote #38869 | |
eruption1962 (1366) | |
September 18, 2014 at 2:01 pm Quote #38872 | |
frankm (4891) | |
September 18, 2014 at 2:02 pm Quote #38873 | |
frankm (4891) |
Thank you for sharing frankmQuote |
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.